Realtime and Liquid Tank Volume Monitoring Based on Internet of Things

Authors

  • Andrizal
  • Dedi Kurniadi
  • Nadia Alfitri
  • Humaira
  • Fiona Novia Hafsyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30630/jeccom.2.2.50-57.2024

Keywords:

Underground Tank, Liquid, Monitoring, Ultrasonic Sensor, Wemos D1 Mini, ESP32, Smartphone, Website

Abstract

An underground tank is a type of tank installed by burying it on the ground. Underground tanks in the form of a storage area with large dimensions for either liquid or gas, especially BBM (fuel) which is stored underground at Public Fuel Filling Stations his (SPBU). The supply of liquid in this tank really needs to be maintained to meet the need for liquid. In order to be able to monitor the volume of liquid in the underground tank, a device was designed that can monitor the volume of liquid in the tank remotely. This device uses an ultrasonic sensor that can detect the volume of liquid that has been converted from the distance detected by the sensor, and uses Wemos D1 mini on the device and ESP32 on the server as a microcontroller that sends data from the reading process to smartphones and websites. The device works on ultrasonic sensor which can sense the distance and with some calculation it detects how much liquid is sensed as a volume and employs a Wemos D1 mini on the side of device and an ESP32 on the server part as a microcontroller that sends reading data to smartphones and websites. The smartphone displays show liquid volume and distance shown by the sensor while in the server display distance is plotted against time in graphical form. Test results reveal that this device can remotely detect underground tank liquid volume using smartphones or websites with a success rate of 72.35%. This failure rate of 27.65% is caused by curved tanksurface and misplacement of the tank.

References

H. A. Ibrahim and H. S. Syed, “Hazard Analysis of Crude Oil Storage Tank Farm,” Int J Chemtech Res, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 300–308, 2018, doi: 10.20902/IJCTR.2018.111132.

V. A. Zhmud, N. O. Kondratiev, K. A. Kuznetsov, V. G. Trubin, and L. V Dimitrov, “Application of ultrasonic sensor for measuring distances in robotics,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1015, p. 032189, May 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1015/3/032189.

O. Appiah, E. Quayson, and E. Opoku, “Ultrasonic sensor based traffic information acquisition system; a cheaper alternative for ITS application in developing countries,” Sci Afr, vol. 9, p. e00487, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00487.

N. I. Abdulkhaleq, I. J. Hasan, and N. A. J. Salih, “Investigating the resolution ability of the HC-SRO4 ultrasonic sensor,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 745, no. 1, p. 012043, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012043.

W. Suryono, A. Setiyo Prabowo, Suhanto, and A. Mu’ti Sazali, “Monitoring and controlling electricity consumption using Wemos D1 Mini and smartphone,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 909, no. 1, p. 012014, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/909/1/012014.

B. Naji, “Wemos-D1 and Raspberry Pi3 Based Smart Communication and Control of Home Appliances System,” Muthanna Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–44, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.18081/mjet/2018-6/29-44.

T. Ethilu, A. Sathappan, and P. Rodrigues, “An Effective Time-Sharing Switch Migration Scheme for Load Balancing in Software Defined Networking,” Journal of Advances in Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 846–856, 2023, doi: 10.12720/jait.14.4.846-856.

C. Mihci and N. Ozdener Donmez, “Teaching GUI-Programming Concepts to Prospective K12 ICT Teachers: MIT App Inventor as an Alternative to Text-Based Languages,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, pp. 543–543, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.21890/ijres.327912.

M. A. and S. Al-Omary, “Quizrevision: A Mobile Application using the Google MIT App Inventor Language Compared with LMS,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 8, no. 6, 2017, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080641.

F. Liu et al., “A Real-Time Closed Tank Capacity Measurement Method for Liquid Volume Supporting the Internet of Things, Big Data and Intelligent Ship Supply Chain,” in 2022 International Conference on Industrial IoT, Big Data and Supply Chain (IIoTBDSC), IEEE, Sep. 2022, pp. 311–316. doi: 10.1109/IIoTBDSC57192.2022.00064.

V. B, S. P. S J, A. S, K. G, K. T, and M. S, “Measuring the Volume of Spherical Tank Using Load Cell,” in 2023 International Conference on Energy, Materials and Communication Engineering (ICEMCE), IEEE, Dec. 2023, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICEMCE57940.2023.10434055.

D. S. Bhandare, V. S. Jape, H. H. Kulkarni, S. M. Mahajan, P. Sable, and Y. Pawar, “Automatic Liquid Level Control of Two Tank System using PLC,” in 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Advanced Applications (ICISAA), IEEE, Oct. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICISAA62385.2024.10828622.

Y. Song et al., “Analysis of Influence of Baffle Number on Liquid Sloshing Characteristics in Tank,” in 2019 2nd World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM), IEEE, Nov. 2019, pp. 113–116. doi: 10.1109/WCMEIM48965.2019.00029.

O. Sierikova, E. Strelnikova, and K. Degtyariov, “Srength Characteristics of Liquid Storage Tanks with Nanocomposites as Reservoir Materials,” in 2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek), IEEE, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/KhPIWeek57572.2022.9916369.

A. V Balakrishnaa and N. K. Arun, “Liquid Level Control of Interacting Coupled Spherical Tank System using PI and Fuzzy PI Controller,” in 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), IEEE, May 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/INCET54531.2022.9824570.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Andrizal, Kurniadi, D., Alfitri, N., Humaira, & Hafsyah, F. N. . (2024). Realtime and Liquid Tank Volume Monitoring Based on Internet of Things . JECCOM: International Journal of Electronics Engineering and Applied Science, 2(2), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.30630/jeccom.2.2.50-57.2024

Issue

Section

Articles